Personal Injury Law Blogs

Shooting and Fiery Crash on Las Vegas Strip Leaves Three Dead

Three people died and at least three others were injured after a shooting and a fiery crash involving six vehicles along the Las Vegas Strip early morning on February 21, 2013.

According to a CNN report, the incident began when someone in an SUV stopped at a light on Las Vegas Boulevard near Caesars Palace, fired into a Maserati that was also stopped there. Las Vegas police say the Maserati moved into the intersection with Flamingo Road and crashed into a taxi starting a chain of crashes that involved four other vehicles.

Fatal Car Accident

The driver of the taxi and a passenger died as did the driver of the Maserati. A passenger in the Maserati suffered gunshot wounds. At least two other people in the crashed vehicles suffered minor to moderate injuries.

Police are still looking for the occupants of the SUV described as a black Range Rover Sport with tinted windows, large black rims and a dealer license plate not from Nevada. There is no information on what may have caused the shooting.

Based on this news report, it appears that the chain-reaction car crash was triggered by the alleged shooter in the Range Rover. In addition, police say that the driver of the Range Rover left the scene of the accident. It is indeed unfortunate that so many people became involved in this incident.

Compensation for Victims and Families

In such cases, injured victims can file a personal injury claim against the at-fault motorist seeking compensation for damages including medical expenses, lost wages, hospitalization, rehabilitation, pain and suffering and emotional distress.

Families of deceased accident victims could file a wrongful death claim seeking compensation for damages such as medical expenses, funeral costs, lost future income, loss of love and companionship and pain and suffering.

Injured victims and families would also be well advised to contact an experienced personal injury lawyer who will stay on top of the official investigation and ensure that their legal rights and best interests are protected.

It is important that those who have been affected in these cases not rush to accept a settlement from other parties or insurance companies. Before you sign off on an agreement, please talk to an injury lawyer who will fight to protect your rights.

Wendy’s Sued Over Parking Lot Pedestrian Accident

On February 21, 2013 in Williston Park, New York, a mother and daughter who were injured in a fast food restaurant are suing not only the woman who hit them but the Wendy’s restaurant where the pedestrian accident took place, according to CBS News in New York.  The mother and her 11-year-old daughter claim that the construction of Wendy’s parking lot may have played a role in the crash that led to their injuries.

Mother and Daughter Suffer Severe Injury

The two victims were visiting a Wendy’s in Williston Park and had just exited the restaurant when a car driven by an elderly woman crashed into them, pinning them both against the wall of the restaurant.

Both mother and daughter suffered crushed leg bones as result of the collision.  The daughter had a severely fractured leg but was released from the hospital after treatment.  The mother remains in a wheelchair after having two fractured legs.

Why Sue Wendy’s?

Many question the value of suing the restaurant for a crash that was obviously caused by an elderly driver.  In fact, the 75-year-old who caused the crash is being named as a defendant in the lawsuit along with Wendy’s International Inc. and Westbury Properties, LLC, who own the site where the crash occurred.

Attorneys for the plaintiff claim that Wendy’s and the property owner are included in the suit because of their failure to install pedestrian safety blocks which might have prevented the crash.

When an owner opens a business to the public, he or she has a duty to provide a basic degree of safety for patrons.  Many businesses opt to put concrete parking blocks at the end of parking spaces.  These blocks prevent drivers from traveling too fast or too close to pedestrians.

In this case, however, the store neglected to put these blocks in place and this neglect was a part of the subsequent collision that caused the victims so much damage.

What Should I Do If I Am Hurt In A Parking Lot Accident?

Not everyone who suffers injury in a parking lot will be able to recover damages from the owner of the building or the company that operates at that site.  The conditions must be very specific and the company must clearly have some form of liability in order for a victim to successfully collect damages.

However, companies may be liable for things that victims are unaware of, such as parking lot safety blocks.  Some victims assume that they cannot collect damages from a company because the company has little or no interest in the matter, but this may not be the case.  A personal injury attorney can examine the situation and provide the client with a legal overview of who is responsible for the injuries.

When you consult a personal injury lawyer, you are taking the best step possible to protect your rights and recover damages for your injuries.  Even if you do not believe that anyone will be held responsible for your accident, talk to a personal injury attorney about your case.

Signs That Point Towards Hiring An Injury Lawyer

When to Call a Work Injury Lawyer

(Guest post) No one wants an attorney to confront his or her employer about a workers compensation claim. Unfortunately though, that is often the only way an injury victim gets compensation. Instead of treating injury victims with dignity, some companies treat them poorly by ignoring their financial needs for the sake of savings money.

When companies take this attitude, they usually exhibit signs that they do not intend to honor a victim’s claim. When injury victims encounter these signs, they should contact an injury lawyer as soon as possible.

Signs that an Insurance Company is Avoiding You

1. Stating the injury did not occur

When an injury does not involve visible signs such as cuts and bruises, some employers and their workers comp insurance carriers claim it never happened. Injuries that employers and their insurance carriers take this approach with include: hearing damage injuries, nerve damage injuries, and mental trauma injuries.

2. Stating the injury is less serious than claimed

When an injury does not involve visible signs of pain, some employers say it is less serious than the victim claims. An employer and its insurance carrier use this tactic to have claims reduced or dismissed. However, a work injury lawyer can use medical findings to ensure the right compensation is reached.

3. Suggesting the injury was caused by something else

After reporting an injury such as a slip and fall accident to their employer, injury victims are often quizzed by insurance carrier’s claims adjusters, who attempt to uncover alternative causes for an injury. Because the goal of claims adjusters is to reduce or dismiss injury claims, claimants should refuse to speak to them and let a work injury lawyer speak with them instead.

4. Disputing a physician’s findings

Employers and their insurance carriers are quick to support medical findings if they suit their goals. When medical findings indicate an injury is serious and will require long treatment, however, some companies and their insurance carriers request more tests, an examination by a different physician, or a second opinion on the original findings. Instead of becoming a guinea pig for their employer and its insurance carrier’s selfish interests, injury victims should call an attorney.

5. Asking for the same forms time and again

Judging by how many times insurance carriers claim to lose or misplace official forms, you would think they didn’t have filing cabinets. In most cases, however, the request for a form to be sent time and again is designed to exhaust the claimant, and it often does. When a workers comp insurance carrier claims to lose, misplace, or not receive forms that have been sent again and again, calling an attorney can end the absurdity.

6. Consistently prolonging the claims process

When an employer and its insurance carrier know that injury victims have not retained an attorney, they often prolong the claims process until they do. From asking for forms to be sent time and again to claiming that a decision that never arrives will be arriving soon, they hold out as long as they can. When an attorney enters the game, however, results can be achieved within days.

Seth Thompson represents Drinkwater & Goldstein LLP in South Jersey.

Looking For A Personal Injury Lawyer: Where to find the Lawyer of your choice

If you have been injured due to another person’s negligence it is important that you look into the effect this has had on you and your family. As the accident and subsequently your injuries are due to no fault of your own you may be entitled to some compensation.  Lawyers will not be difficult to locate and there will be lots of help and support on hand given to you by these legal representatives.

Go visit a Medical Professional

It is essential that you visit a medical professional to look at your injuries as this documented information will assist and prove crucial for your case to win your claim. Your medical notes will be evidence and back up the injuries you have received due the accident.

Once you have realised you are owed compensation to you for losses affecting your everyday life you will require legal aid. Lawyers should be both knowledgeable and experienced in cases due to personal injury. They will know how to file the case and will use the effective tools in order to help you claim what you are rightfully owed. Losses you may suffer can affect different areas of your life such as physically, mentally and emotionally.

Getting the right advice

Under the right advice and support from your lawyer they will make your compensation both simple and easy. If you were to take this role on yourself it would create a lot of stress in your life. Hiring a lawyer will give the peace of mind you require and deserve. Lawyers will gather information for evidence to aid you in your case. They will also use their negotiating skills to ensure you receive the rightfully owed money you have lost due to your personal injury.

In order to locate the right lawyer for you the first port of call will be to search in your area. If for example you live in Miami Florida lawyers in this location will be easy to find. Other tips that are useful are to find a lawyer that specialises in personal injury. Law is a very broad term and there are many different areas.  Lawyers will specialise in different aspects of law which will mean they can handle your case more effectively.

Research on the Internet

The Internet is a handy and useful tool to help you search for the right representative for you. By putting the name of the place you live – Miami Florida lawyers in the search engine it will bring a long list of lawyers for you to choose from. If you want to be more specific and narrow down your search criteria you can type in Miami Florida lawyer personal injury. Using different key words will assist you in your findings.

Be certain to check the websites you are visiting and ensure that they are a reputable lawyer coming from a decent firm. By reading the testimonials it will give you an idea of the cases they have worked on and if previous clients have been pleased with their outcome. You can use the Bar Association to check their reputation and this will give you an extra piece of mind.

Daisy Chambers has helped many people make claims for a number of different areas in the legal sector, and continues to write regularly on law related topics.

Taking a Closer Look at Concussions

Not every traumatic brain injury results in debilitating injuries. Victims commonly experience mild brain trauma as a result of falls, automobile accidents, and sports accidents. These injuries ordinarily require little in the way of rehabilitation. However, repeated injuries can result in serious harm and the mild nature of concussions makes some parties dismiss their importance. Athletes are particularly at risk for repeated injuries.

What is a Concussion?

A concussion is a mild traumatic brain injury that results from a sudden acceleration or deceleration of the skull, causing the brain to exceed the protective threshold normally offered by a layer of cerebrospinal fluid. This occurs when sudden forces are imparted onto the skull, resulting in an injury that is less severe than other brain injuries. Victims of a concussion may experience poor coordination, headaches, tinnitus, and distorted vision. Inattentiveness and behavioral problems may also result.

Treating a concussion is simple. Concussions normally call for rest, low-intensity physical activity, and mild painkillers taken with the consent of the treating physician. However, some concussions can be more serious. While concussions are almost never fatal, suffering a second concussion while suffering from an initial concussion may result in serious brain injury. A second impact may result in dangerous and potentially fatal brain swelling. Additionally, a history of multiple concussions sustained over a long period of time can result in irreversible brain damage.

Civil Liability, Concussions, and Sports

Concussive injuries commonly occur as a result of accidents during sporting events; according to the United States Centers for Disease Control, roughly 300,000 concussions are reported every year as a result of sporting activities. Helmets and neck braces can help to reduce the forces imparted onto the head and neck, decreasing the extent to which a victim becomes injured, but injuries occur regardless. Contact sports such as football and boxing are common sources of sports-related concussions.

Sporting events that result in injuries do not always result in civil liability. When engaged in a sporting event, players normally assume the risk that they will suffer an injury. If the player understands the risk and knowingly waives his or her right to recovery, the player will be precluded from recovering damages. Written waivers are common features of sporting events for this reason.

However, in a push to provide skilled athletes to games against rival teams, some coaches encourage athletes to “play through the pain,” or play the game regardless of the player’s injuries. Since most concussions do not result in a loss of consciousness, many go undiagnosed. Dismissing a concussion as a headache and failing to recognize the signs of a traumatic brain injury is a common and potentially fatal mistake. If the coach should have recognized the extent of the injury and encouraged the athlete to play, the coach would ordinarily be liable for negligence and any institution employing the coach may be vicariously liable for the coach’s negligence as well as being liable for its own. This is the case unless the injured party assumed the risk of the injury.

Courts in different states apply the assumption of risk doctrine differently. For example, in New York, a court is likely to hold that the plaintiff assumed the risk if he or she engaged in a non-compulsory sporting event, as any New York brain injury lawyer can tell you. Across the country in California, courts tend to apply a comparative fault analysis to an assumption of risk defense. Some states analyze whether the risk itself was reasonable, some states focus on whether the plaintiff knowingly assumed the risk, some states generally ignore the assumption of risk doctrine, and some states uphold it in the absence of willful or reckless conduct.

How a particular state applies the assumption of risk doctrine will be the difference between a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and a summary judgment in favor of the defendant. If the sporting event was mandatory, if the coach ordered the player to play with a concussion, or if the player himself understood the risks, a court may be more likely to provide some equitable relief to the plaintiff. The circumstances surrounding the injury and the locally preferred interpretation of the assumption of risk doctrine will be dispositive of the issue.

Hundreds of thousands of concussions occur every year. Repeated concussions can cause long-term damage and even death. Concussions are mild brain injuries, but brain injuries nonetheless. What appears to be a concussion may mask a more serious injury such as a subdural hematoma or fractured skull. Anyone who suffers ill effects as a result of a blow to the head should seek prompt medical attention. If the blow was a result of another party’s reckless conduct, seek experienced legal counsel in your jurisdiction.

Anthony Joseph is a freelance author who writes about various legal matters, and is contributing this article for the purpose of raising awareness about brain injuries. Every New York brain injury lawyer at the Bottar Leone firm has a wealth of knowledge and experience involving brain injury cases. They have a full grasp on the medical and legal issues that are involved in proving how a brain injury occurred.

Facts about Drunk Driving Accidents

Drunk driving and speeding are the two leading causes of traffic fatalities and injuries. In 2010, more than 10,000 people were killed due to the actions of a drunk driver, and this accounts for 31 percent of all of the traffic fatalities that occurred that year. Additionally, more than 524,000 traffic injuries are attributed to drunk drivers each year in the U.S. alone. Although approximately 1.4 million people are arrested for a DUI annually, an estimated 110 million additional drivers will get behind the wheel while they are intoxicated.

Does Age Impact Drunk Driving Accidents?

Although younger drivers are more likely to be arrested for a DUI, the age gap is not nearly as wide as most people would assume. In 2010, drivers between the ages of 21 and 24 accounted for 34 percent of all the DUIs that caused a fatality. However, drivers aged 25 to 34 were responsible for 30 percent of the drunk driving related deaths, and drivers between the ages of 35 to 44 caused an additional 25 percent of the DUI fatalities.

Not only does this prove that anyone between the ages of 21 and 44 represents a high DUI risk, but it also proves that underage drinking does not cause the most fatalities. In fact, the remaining 11 percent of DUI related traffic fatalities in 2010 were caused by a combination of drivers under the age of 21 and over the age of 44.

Dealing with an Accident

If you are injured by a drunk driver, you should contact a personal injury attorney after you receive medical attention. It may be necessary to sue the other driver, and contacting a lawyer quickly can help you determine the viability of your case. In order to file a successful lawsuit, you will need to gather as much evidence as possible. Therefore, you should keep copies of anything that you receive from the hospital or your doctor.

If you are at fault for the accident, you should get in contact with a driver defence service who can help you to deal with the offence (UK suggestion above).

It is also a good idea to take photographs of your injury and the scene of the accident. This documentation will make it difficult for the driver’s attorney to refute your injury claims. However, you can make an even stronger case by obtaining a medical expert witness who can explain to the judge and jury exactly how the accident caused your injuries and how they are expected to impact the rest of your life.

Causing a DUI Accident

If you choose to drive while you are intoxicated, you are taking a very big risk. Not only will a DUI charge cause you several legal and social issues, but injuring or killing another person will cause you to face very strict fines and penalties. According to the website of a highly respected NJ DWI lawyer, if you injure someone in New Jersey while driving under the influence, you can be charged with an indictable or felony level criminal charge where a judge will determine your fate. Every state enforces serious penalties and fines for those convicted of DWI with injury charges.

For example, if you are convicted of a first offense DUI in Michigan without injuring someone, you can receive a prison sentence of up to 93 days, a fine up to $500, 360 hours of community service and a mandatory interlock ignition device for your vehicle. However, if you injure someone, you will be facing up to five years in prison and a fine of up to $5,000. The penalties associated with killing someone while driving drunk in Michigan include a 15 year prison sentence and a fine of up to $10,000.

The most important step that you can take if you are arrested for a DUI is contacting an attorney. Although you do not have to take a lawyer with you to court, your odds of avoiding a DUI conviction will be greatly increased with an experienced attorney on your side. View here to learn more information about DUIs and how to deal with situations like this.

Legal researcher Shelby Warden writes articles to raise awareness in our communities. Evan Levow, of Levow & Associates, is a nationally recognized NJ DWI lawyer who set the standard for DWI defense and prosecution in New Jersey while representing the lead defendant in a DWI Breath testing case that also affected national protocol. He represents clients in all 21 counties in New Jersey.

Should Punitive Damages Be Eliminated?

Punitive damages are monetary damages that are awarded to a plaintiff to punish the defendant and to deter the defendant from engaging in similar conduct in the future. These exemplary damages are awarded to the plaintiff in addition to the actual damages awarded by either the jury or the judge if the right to a trial by jury has been waived. Awarded in civil lawsuits, punitive damages have been awarded in the court of law since the 1970’s and are meant to benefit society as a whole.

What Types of Conduct Might Lead to Punitive Damages?

Punitive damages are seen as a way to send a message to the defendant, but they are also very controversial in both civil and product liability lawsuits. Because there is not a definitive definition of punitive damages, the wrongdoing that the defendant is found guilty of can vary. If the defendant acts intentionally or with malicious intent, they may be ordered to pay punitive damages. Some of the most common damaged awarded to plaintiffs are when the conduct can be justified as oppression, reckless, violent in nature, fraudulent, or malice. These non-compensatory damages are typically only rewarded to plaintiffs after compensatory damages are awarded.

Why Are Punitive Damages Unique in Civil Law?

Criminal law and civil law are different in many ways. One of the main reasons why punitive damages are unique and also controversial in civil law is because they are awarded in civil law but they mimic the awards that would be granted in a criminal case. Civil cases that are filed by plaintiffs in private civil lawsuits are typically involve granting awards that are compensatory in nature. Because punitive damages are non-compensatory in nature, they are similar to the judgments that are awarded in a criminal case. This is why punitive damages are often characterized as “quasi-criminal”.

Why Do Critics Believe that Punitive Damages Need to Be Eliminated?

There are both supporters and critics of punitive damages. While the supporters believe that these damages act as a compensatory award when the actual losses the plaintiff suffers cannot be described as a tangible harm, critics say that these quasi-criminal punishments are not fair or reasonable for today’s modern society. Critics say that these punishments, which are criminal in nature, should not be enforced on defendants who do not have the normal protection under the criminal court procedure.

Another critique that must be considered is the vagueness of the standards that are set to determine how much punitive damages should be awarded. While some states have developed new procedures and new definitions of what is considered eligible for punitive damages, the guidelines for assessing punitive damages are still very muddled and cloudy.

The Undeserved Financial Windfall Argument

These non-compensatory damages are justified because supporters believe that by awarding these damages, it benefits society in the future by deterring the defendant from harming or injuring another party in the future. Critics argue that awarding plaintiffs with undeserved financial compensation does not benefit society in any way. The public does not benefit from the plaintiff’s compensation and some states are requiring that these damages are awarded to the state for public good.

When justice and public good are considered, punitive damages will continue to be a controversial issue. Based on the vague classifications of damages, punitive damages should be eliminated. There is no proof that these damages do deter future misconduct and the idea of being awarded punitive damages may actually may society more litigious.

Byline
This piece was written by Michael Woodrow, a freelance writer who focuses on law, social justice, law and media, legal philosophy, the legal system, and other areas. Getting involved with the legal system often complicates one’s life in many ways; improving one’s record can often help with your job.

The Injuries You’re Most at Risk For at Work

Let’s be honest, some jobs are dangerous and require tasks that aren’t always the safest. Most companies do a substantial job of protecting workers and enforcing security measures, but accidents just happen unexpectedly.

An employee or employer could be at fault for the accident, but most circumstances are random and it’s hard to determine fault. However, workers must be protected while on the jobsite because their overall health and wellbeing is at risk. While injuries affect health first and foremost, injuries cause heartache in other areas, such as family, income and psychological damage.

Which Injuries Are More Prone To Occur?

According to previous data, from 2007-2011, the most common injuries reported on jobsites are trauma to muscles, tendons, bones, ligaments, the back and spinal cord. These injuries are more likely because of the nature of some jobs and because these injuries are more common across the board. Depending on the nature of the job, these injuries just occur from time to time and the employer is responsible to take care of the worker—worker’s compensation.

Don’t Be Neglected

To be protected from negligence by the employer or a refusal to provide compensation for injury and damages, lawyers are equipped to offer legal advice and service to protect workers and help them receive the compensation they need.

As a worker, in any field, you don’t have to put up with negligence. While you may not want to start a lawsuit, to avoid controversy, it’s the necessary action if you have been wronged in such a case. Also, you may not have to go to court, but file a claim and settle outside of court.

As a worker, the smartest decision is to consult with a legal professional, especially one who specializes in personal injury law. Legal advice is most important because it will help you make the right decision and steer clear of making a poor decision that will hurt or impede your current situation.

No matter what profession you’re in, or the company you work for, if you have been wronged in a personal injury case on the job, then you deserve the right to legal action. Not only are you receiving what you deserve, but you might make a statement for other workers who may be wronged as well.

Bio: Trent is a writer/marketer for Genesis Net Development and works with clients in numerous disciplines to develop greater web presence. Trent is also studying in the field of journalism.

(Links are affiliated with Joe Carson, Oklahoma Injury Lawyer)

The Differences Between New Jersey and Pennsylvania Intestacy Law

Guest blog post regarding the differences between New Jersey and Pennsylvania Intestacy Law.

Mourning the loss of a loved one is a difficult process, and you are often left to deal with legal issues that can make this time even more stressful and confusing. If your loved one did not leave a will and was 18 or older, they are said to have died “intestate.” Intestacy law is there to ensure that the family is not left uncared for. Damages are divided under this law amongst the remaining family members.

The priorities under intestate law for Pennsylvania and New Jersey are similar, but not exactly alike. Given the different circumstances, intestate law determines the order in which estate and belongings are distributed. Learn the priorities and differences between Pennsylvania and New Jersey intestacy laws:

  • In New Jersey, if there are no children or parents involved, everything goes to the spouse. Pennsylvania intestacy law states that as long as no parents or children are living, everything goes to the spouse as well.
  • If there is a spouse and parents living and no children, in Pennsylvania everything goes to the spouse. In New Jersey, if spouse is living and parents but no children, the spouse takes the first $50,000 plus half the balance of the estate and the remainder is equally divided between the parents.
  • New Jersey intestacy law states that if children are involved and related to the spouse, the spouse gets the first $50,000, plus half the balance of the estate; the children of the same generation split the remainder equally. In Pennsylvania, if the children are also the spouse’s, the spouse takes half the estate and $30,000. If the children are not the spouse’s, the spouse only takes half the estate and the remainder is divided amongst the children.
  • In Pennsylvania, if there is no spouse, the children take all and shares are divided equally to children of the same generation. Only if there are parents, no children or spouse do parents share equally in Pennsylvania. In New Jersey, if there are no children or spouse, parents split equally. If there are no parents, the parents’ children of the same generation divide equally.

For more information on New Jersey and Pennsylvania intestacy laws visit Justice.gov. If you feel that you have a New Jersey wrongful death case or would like to learn more about New Jersey and Pennsylvania wrongful death laws, contact the experts at Meyerson and O’Neill law firm today at 877-373-8059.

What You Need To Know About Medical Malpractice

(US law) Considering that 195,000 people are killed on average every year in the U.S. because of medical malpractice means that it’s not as uncommon as people think. You hope doctors, nurses and other medical professionals know what they are doing in the moment, but they have lapses in thought and knowledge at times and make the wrong decision. While some truly aren’t intentionally neglecting their responsibility, others aren’t taking their position as serious.

It’s a serious issue because too many people are dying because of a medical professional’s negligence. Now, not every medical malpractice case results in death. Many cases result in minor mishaps, but nonetheless, those mishaps can affect a person’s life forever. People need to be protected from minor mistakes as well.

In a malpractice case, the physician, doctor or whoever made the mistake is at fault and must be held responsible for their actions. Patients can make a case when wronged by medical professionals, but patients must act fast.

What To Know

The most important point to remember is that your case has more weight if evidence is presented in a timely manner. You need to gather information in a timely manner so you can present information to an attorney and begin the process of developing a claim. If you fail to act, then the period for filing a claim will conclude and you will be left helpless.

In a medical malpractice case you must be able to prove several elements to establish a substantial claim:

  • A physician, hospital or healthcare provider undertook care or treatment of a patient.
  • The provider did not perform standard care.
  • An injury was the result of the lack of standard care.
  • Damage must be proven (either physical or emotional).

Your Best Decision

Of course, as the patient or family, collecting and developing this information is difficult on your own. Also, if you haven’t had any experience with the law, you may not know which information to gather and which to compile. This is why you must speak with an attorney who specializes in personal injury law, especially medical malpractice. You need a professional who knows what they’re looking for and how to establish those elements listed above.

You can start the process by filing your claim to a personal injury attorney, to get the ball rolling. Some attorneys require a fee for the initial review of a claim; however, others do not. Once you have submitted your malpractice claim, the attorney will review it and consider the substantiality of the case. If it is determined to hold up, the attorney will pursue the claim and continue communication.

Again, it’s crucial that you contact a personal injury attorney as soon as possible and provide necessary information up front. Consider the 4 elements listed above and how those can be proven to substantiate your claim. Once you do that, just hope a settlement comes either out of court or through the work of a judge and jury.