Personal Injury Law Blogs

Reasons of Hiring Personal Injury Solicitors from a Common Man’s Angle of Understanding

Living off the edge is the new definition of life in the modern times. When the speed is fast, risks mount higher and so do the impacts of mishaps. But, things take a nasty turn when you stand at the receiving end of someone’s depraved conduct. However, immorality does not always have to be out of intention, but can also be out of sheer negligence. If you not paying close attention, you can miss out on a lot of important things that can give your life an entirely different turn that you didn’t plan. Personal injury solicitors are the friends that money can buy if you are strapped by a faultless accident.

However, when the time or need arrives to hire a solicitor, people take a rather thoughtless stance thinking of the capricious ways in which the legal system of the nation works. Claim makers usually think in two ways, one in which they think that can win a case by themselves, and another in which they think that expending on a lawyer is mindless as deserved compensation is anyways irrecoverable. Turning these two trains of thoughts into a new direction, personal injury lawyers have established their importance in a case through their taint-free track records. If you are not familiar with the credentials of a personal injury solicitor, then go ahead and learn more about them online.

Generally speaking, these lawyers are on a winning streak with most of them brandishing a good amount of success in their career. Though skepticism prevails around the generally high success of these lawyers, things are quite clear, if looked at from the most obvious angle. Claim cases are one of the most favored cases that are presented in the civil courts of the UK. In a bid to make sure that the duty of care is least breached and that the city liberties are not illegally taken away from individuals, the legal rules pertaining to Tort law is quite resilient to the victims. However, this does not necessarily guarantee a favorable result for all cases. It is only the personal injury solicitors who about these pointers and keep the case going in sync with the parameters.

As a common man who has not much to do with law, it is highly unwise to venture into anything as claim making with one of these professionals. Their legal fees might worry you, but their involvement manifolds the winning chances. Hire a personal injury solicitor today to claim your right with a winning likeliness.

Are you on a look-out for potential personal injury solicitor who has an impressive track record? Visit our site to make contacts with some of the most adroit personal injury solicitors to appoint for your case.

Injury Lawsuits Against Hair Loss Drug Manufacturer Persist

Hundreds of men throughout the United States have filed lawsuits to seek justice for their injuries from using the popular hair loss drug Propecia. These men who trusted Propecia’s manufacturer Merck, assumed that the hair loss drug was safe, and that Merck had appropriately disclosed all of the side effects connected with the drug’s use. Unfortunately, this has not been the case.

Since there has been a large amount of lawsuit filings, and because of the anticipated increase in Propecia lawsuits, a Propecia MDL (“Multidistrict Litigation”) has been established in the Eastern District of New York to collect and process all Propecia lawsuits filed across the nation.

Propecia’s Harmful Side Effects

The FDA approved Propecia (finasteride 1 mg) for male pattern hair loss. Since it has been introduced to the market in the late 1990’s, thousands of men have used the hair loss drug with the presumption of growing back or at least maintaining their hairline. However, recent studies have shown that Propecia has been correlated with impotence, erectile dysfunction, loss of libido, lowered semen output, testicular pain, and orgasm disorders, even after discontinuation of the drug.

Unfortunately, for the men who tried this medicine for hair loss, Merck only warned that Propecia may cause temporary sexual side effects while using the drug, but failed to disclose the fact that these side effects could be permanent for some men after stopping use. In fact, the company assuredly stated the complete opposite: that all sexual side effects “went away” in all men who used the drug:

A small number of men experienced certain sexual side effects. These men reported one or more of the following: less desire for sex; difficulty in achieving an erection; and, a decrease in the amount of semen. Each of these side effects occurred in less than 2% of men. These side effects went away in men who stopped taking PROPECIA. They also disappeared in most men who continued taking PROPECIA.

In 2012, as a result of men suffering persistent and harmful sexual side effects, the FDA required Merck to modify Propecia’s labeling “libido disorders, ejaculation disorders, and orgasm disorders that continued after discontinuation of the drug,” as well as incidents of male infertility and poor semen quality.

If the sexual side effects were not alarming enough for this cosmetic drug, recent studies have demonstrated that the Finasteride in Propecia can cause other serious and harmful side effects. Men who have used Propecia for hair loss have been shown to have an increased likelihood of oppressing issues of anxiety, depression, and thoughts of suicide. Moreover, Propecia has been linked to problems with clouding of consciousness, impaired cognitive ability and loss of memory. In addition to that and even more disheartening, Propecia may cause penile deformity (including Peyronie’s disease) and a version of high grade cancer of the prostate.

The Basis For Filing A Propecia Lawsuit

Male pattern balding and hair loss occurrs naturally, it is cosmetic and not a disease. In many instances, hair loss can be troublesome for the men experiencing it and many men have said “I never would have taken this drug if I knew I could be permanently injured…my hair is definitely not worth this.” These men were denied an informed choice about using Propecia.

Because of the undisclosed, harmful side effects, many men across the country have subsequently filed a Propecia lawsuit against Merck for permanent injuries that they now face. These men used Merck’s “miracle” hair loss drug to combat their thinning hair; they trusted that the pill was safe and trusted Merck that the side effects would “go away” if they tried and stopped taking Propecia. For hundreds, and possibly thousands of men, these severe side effects have not “gone away.” Consequently, the number of filed Propecia lawsuits are now at an all time high for men seeking justice for their injuries.

For more information on determining if you may have been permanently injured by Propecia and if you may in fact have a Propecia lawsuit visit www.propecialawsuits.com.

Understanding GranuFlo and Its Dangers

(US Law) GranuFlo is a medical product known as a dry acid concentrate that has often been used in various kidney dialysis procedures. When a person’s kidneys begin to fail, some form of dialysis is necessary, and GranuFlo has been used in many different patients. Products like GranuFlo are used to extract dangerous acids and substances from a person’s bloodstream, work that would normally be done by functioning kidneys. Typically, GranuFlo, a dialysate, neutralizes acids that are in a person’s blood, and produces bicarbonates. But researchers are now suggesting that GranuFlo has too much of the neutralizing ingredient, which has led to some very serious physical conditions because of the development of too much bicarbonates in the blood.

While GranuFlo has helped some patients with dialysis procedures, it has also recently been linked to extremely serious heart problems. Last year, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) even issued a Class 1 recall of GranuFlo because of the dangers it poses for patients who used it. You can learn more about the FDA’s recall here.

GranuFlo is associated with various dangerous heart problems and conditions. Many people have reported side effects of GranuFlo that range from minor to severe, and even life-threatening at times. Several of the most common side effects that GranuFlo has been linked to by numerous patients include:

  • Stroke
  • Heart Attack
  • Cardiac Arrest
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias
  • Other Heart Problems

Each of these potential side effects of GranuFlo can, of course, be threatening to a person’s well-being, and might result in lasting damage to that person’s health. These are the kinds of conditions that, if left untreated or if not treated quickly enough, can easily lead to a fatality. Sadly, although the FDA did issue a recall of this drug, the warning of GranuFlo’s dangers came too late for far too many patients who already suffered from its effects. Fortunately, some who have been negatively affected by GranuFlo have been able to file a GranuFlo lawsuit to pursue financial compensation for their suffering.

Sandy’s aftermath – Can all damages be rightly claimed?

The fierce Hurricane Sandy has left thousands of people in heavily damaged homes, without power, heat or hot water. Many of Sandy’s victims are still suffering, and living conditions are harsh for tens of thousands of people who have still been unable to return to their homes.

Hurricane Sandy destroyed the east coast and left New Jersey coastal towns, New York City and plenty of other locations with billions of dollars worth of damages. Teams are working night and day — ordering home inspections, helping people get meals, water and gas for generators.

With cases of flooding, structural damage, power outages and more, the clean-up process for Sandy is certain to be extended and costly. In a situation like this, many homeowners’ insurance policies are pretty clever and do not cover the cost caused from flooding. In order for flood claims to be paid, a consumer must have already purchased a flood policy prior to the arrival of Hurricane Sandy.

Many victims may have to sue their insurance companies to get full coverage for weather related damages. In context of the present bad economy, most Americans probably cannot afford the services of an experienced lawyer.

In a situation like this, it is best for victims to get free legal advice and take advantage from pro bono legal services available online. These services have a staff of renowned lawyers and paralegals that will assist you in getting your required claim for damage caused as a result of Sandy.

Let’s hope the US law can get all damages caused as a result of the ferocious Sandy rightly claimed for ones who deserve the most…

Dog Sitter Can Sue for Dog Bite Injury, Court Decides

Trenton, New Jersey—A state appellate court in New Jersey has ruled that a woman who was paid to watch a dog can sue the animal’s owners for a bite injury she sustained, according to Fox New York News. Normally, an owner can be sued for a dog bite; however, an earlier court ruling had barred the woman’s suit based on the fact that the dog was not known to be dangerous. Victims of dog bites are often forced to hire a dog bite attorney to help them recover damages.

Facts of the Case

The woman, who resides in Bergen County, had agreed to watch her neighbor’s dog, a golden retriever, while the family was on vacation. In return, the owner agreed to pay the woman $300. She took the dog to her home and the animal reportedly bit her when she reached to pick up a napkin.

The woman sued the family in Superior Court for the damages she received as a result of the dog bite. However, the court ruled that the woman was not entitled to collect damages unless she could reasonably prove that the animal was known to be prone to biting or attacks.

However, the appellate court disagreed with the Superior Court judge’s ruling. The appellate court based its decision on the fact that the woman should have been treated as an independent contractor performing a job for the couple. It was established that the woman earned money by pet-sitting, and the appellate court ruled that this changed the circumstances under which the dog bite would be treated.

Liability Issues with Dog Bites

Every state applies its own rules about dog bites. In some states, there is a “one bite” rule. This essentially means that the first time a dog bites, the owner is not liable for damages because the owner must have knowledge that the dog was vicious. Any subsequent bites can result in a lawsuit against the owner for damages.

In California, however, owners are responsible for their animals no matter how many times they may or may not have bitten. The first time a dog bites and causes injury in our state, the owner can be held liable for damages.

What To Do If You Are Bitten By A Dog

Dog bites are a special type of personal injury because they involve not only physical trauma but health risks. Dogs carry a number of diseases, and an owner who fails to have his or her animal vaccinated can unwitting cause death or serious medical problems for a victim who is bitten by the dog at a later time.

If you are bitten by a dog, the first thing to do is to seek immediately medical attention. Even if the bite looks slight or is not very painful, it is important for you to have the wound cleansed and begin a course of treatment in case of any infectious diseases that may be present.

Next, gather your medical records and visit a personal injury lawyer who handles dog bite cases for advice on how to recover damages for your injuries.

Toning Shoes Injuries

Toning shoes, a popular trend among top shoe manufacturers that surfaced and gained worldwide renown in 2010, promise to improve the muscle tone of the calves, thighs and buttocks when worn consistently during regular walking. The curved, rolling soles of this type of shoe cause the wearer to walk unstably, forcing the targeted muscle groups to work harder to keep the body upright and properly balanced.

While the idea may sound like a good one in theory, toning shoes have recently shown that not all intriguing notions are successful in practice. Some of the biggest names in the shoe production business, including Reebok, Sketchers and New Balance, have been forced to pay out millions of dollars in order to settle personal injury claims by customers all over the world.

According to ConsumerReports.org, the majority of injuries sustained by people wearing toning shoes involve loss of balance that leads to a fall, a twisted ankle and chronic pain in the legs or joints. Some cases, however, include reports of fractured bones and tendinitis, both of which may result in the need for corrective surgery if the injury is sufficiently serious. In many reports of injury associated with toning shoes, the wearer was not aware of a significant injury until weeks or even months had passed, primarily due to the fact that the shoes are capable of causing long-term injuries and changes to the arch of the foot that do not present immediately with pain or discomfort. Strained Achilles tendons are another common report among women who had worn the shoes while walking on inclined surfaces, such as a sidewalk or treadmill.

Though research regarding the safety and effectiveness of toning shoes is still ongoing in various parts of the country, the numbers that have been presented thus far are compelling. Many people who have purchased toning shoes and similar designs with comparable advertising campaigns swear by their choice, stating that the unevenly shaped footwear does, indeed, make a difference in the appearance of their legs, buttocks and even abdominal muscles.

Healthcare experts, including podiatrists, however, tend to disagree. In many cases, if the manufacturer’s instructions concerning safe use of the shoes are not followed to the letter, the risk of potential injury is far greater than any beneficial effects that might be noticed after months of wearing the product. The final verdict is that the only proven way to lose weight, gain muscle tone and maintain a fit and healthy lifestyle is to exercise regularly and follow a nutritious diet plan. Any pair of shoes that promises visible, positive results without the need to work out is more than likely an expensive gimmick, Consumer Reports’ experts say.

Diehard fans of this type of shoe continue to support their favorite brands, but even the shoe manufacturers themselves are unable to produce credible research data proving the efficacy of their products. When asked to provide substantial information gleaned from alleged case studies, New Balance, Skechers, Avia, Champion and various other companies consistently refused to comply.

If you or a loved one has experienced any type of adverse effect directly related to the use of toning shoes, you may be entitled to compensation for your inconvenience, pain, healthcare expenses and more.

 

Phillip DeBerard, Injury Attorney is a personal injury law firm located in Florida.  For moreinformation, please visit us at www.flainjurylawyer.com .

Are Pit Bull Dangers Exaggerated?

dog bitesFirst, for the truly freaked out, it bears noting that there is no actual “pit bull” breed. The breed is actually a combination of five, all known fondly as “bully breeds.”

These include not only theAmerican Pit Bull Terrier and the American Staffordshire Terrier, but – according to some dog lovers – the Bull Terrier and the American Bulldog. Some extend the definition of bully breeds to cover the beloved Boxer, the Bull Mastiff and even the French Bulldog, but purists insist only the first two above are true pit bulls.

Other breeds that can be mistaken for pit bulls include the Presa Canario, the Cane Corso, the Dogo Argentino, the Tosa Inu, the Bull Mastiff, the Dogue de Bordeaux, the Alapaha Blue Blood Bulldog and the Olde English Bulldogg(e).

I think that final “e”  is carrying the distinction a tad too far, but the truth is the pit bull was originally brought to America by English immigrants. Not on the Mayflower, however; that honor goes to an English Springer Spaniel and an Old English Mastiff, a giant, short-haired dog with a heavy head and short muzzle – a description which immediately highlights the confusion between pit bulls and other bully breeds.

Among English immigrants, the pit bull was bred from the bulldog, once known as a “gripping dog” for its habit of hanging on to large wild game. Only much later – from the early 19th into the 20th century, for example – was this noble breed bred and trained to participate in a bloody, demeaning sport called “baiting.”

Usually practiced with bears or other wild and innately vicious animals like badgers, baiting was eventually outlawed in the UK, Canada and most of the United States. The exception is Louisiana, where the sport uses hogs as bait and Kevlar, chest protectors and collars to protect the dogs.

Dogs, like other animals, tend to fight with the intention of “making a good show of it” without incurring, or delivering, a great deal of harm. The fighting behavior is almost always ritualized, the idea being to intimidate and drive away the competitor, but this is not an effective strategy if it also involves injuring or killing the winning animal, which otherwise planned to stay in what it considered its territory.

The Fight

Pit bulls, on the other hand, have been bred to replace ritual fighting (little or no bloodshed) with actual fighting, and may as a result bite harder than needed to assert superiority.

This does not mean that they can’t be around other dogs, or humans. Nor are they bloodthirsty and willing to fight to the death. Even among the breed, temperaments differ, as they do among others. The only thing the pit bull’s breeding ancestry insures is that some dogs will be easily encouraged to fight with other dogs.

The way to prevent extraordinary aggressiveness is early and extensive socialization, not merely with other dogs but with other people. Fortunately, the pit bull’s early breeders were as famed for producing dogs that were manageable around people as they were for dogs that would hang on and fight to the finish with bears and the like. To this end, any pit bull that behaved badly toward humans was killed, to eliminate that genetic trait from future generations. This earned them the right to lives in owner’s homes, around other members of the family, and gave them the name of “nursemaid dog” for their gentleness around infants and young children, according to the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, or ASPCA.

After socialization, pit bull puppies must also be trained, and the training reinforced on an almost daily basis. The result is almost always a superbly self-disciplined dog with intense loyalty to its owner and the owner’s family – a dedication which in pit bulls manifests as letting its tail or ears be pulled without a whimper (or even a sotto voce snarl)!

Does this mean you can leave your nine-month old alone on the floor with a pit bull? Probably not, but only because you can’t safely leave your baby alone on the floor with any dog (or cat, for that matter). Any dog can, and will, bite; any cat can and will bite, scratch and claw. Pit bulls, with their massive heads and powerful jaws, bite even harder, and sometimes this biting is done in the same fashion they would bite their own puppies – to carry them back to the nest. Unfortunately, babies don’t have loose skin flaps around their neck.

Hardison & Cochran, Attorneys at law are personal injury lawyers located in Raleigh, North Carolina. For more information, please visit us at www.lawyernc.com

Do Bluetooth Systems in Vehicles Really Cut Down on Distracted Driving?

bluetooth and drivingDistracted driving is becoming a huge problem in the USA. With more people unable to ignore their phones, traffic accidents are on the rise. In fact, texting while driving makes the driver 23 times more likely to be involved in a crash. While 93 percent of drivers recently surveyed said they would support a ban of handheld devices in cars in the USA, a shockingly high percentage of people have admitted to using their phone while driving. Bluetooth systems are available, but do they really cut down on distracted driving? Read on for more information.

What is Distracted Driving?

Distracted driving is when a driver engages in an activity that is unrelated to driving and distracts their attention away from the road. Distractions can be cognitive, visual, or manual, or a combination of the three. Visual distractions are anything that takes a driver’s eyes off the road, such as reading a roadside sign. Manual distractions are any activities or events that cause a driver’s hands to leave the wheel, such as unwrapping a snack. Cognitive distractions will pull a driver’s attention and focus away from the road, such as a child’s tantrum in the car. As you can see, it’s not just technology that causes distracted driving. However, texting causes visual, cognitive, and manual distraction, making it especially dangerous.

How Do Bluetooth Systems Help?

Bluetooth systems do help decrease the risk of distracted driving. Bluetooth enabled headsets, GPS units, and even car decks are now available by high-profile companies such as Motorola and Garmin in order to help drivers avoid in-car technological distractions. Bluetooth devices still allow drivers to answer urgent calls or texts but in a way that won’t result in manual and visual distractions. Many products have voice recognition features meaning no touching is required and two hands can be kept on the wheel. The bonus is that clip-on Bluetooth systems are rarely over $100.

Many new cars these days are enabled with Bluetooth hands-free systems. With a system already built into a car, a driver’s eyes won’t have to leave the road for even a second.

Are There Drawbacks to Bluetooth Systems?

Research done at the University of Alabama in Birmingham has shown that Bluetooth devices cannot eliminate the risk of distracted driving. While Bluetooth systems can help reduce visual and manual distraction, they can still cause cognitive distraction; a phone conversation could pull a driver’s thoughts away from the road. No Bluetooth system can make a driver immune from being in an accident. The study suggests that the only way to eliminate the risk of distracted driving is to ban Bluetooth systems as well.

Studies from Virginia Tech have shown that when a driver takes their eyes off the road for even a few seconds, their chance of being in an accident increases by 80 percent. Your driver’s education classes might seem like a long time ago, the reality is that driving still requires concentration and vigilance. While Bluetooth devices can help eliminate distracted driving, these systems cannot prevent it. Common sense and caution must always be used when behind the wheel in order to keep you, and others, safe on the road.

If another person’s negligence while driving caused an accident that injured you or a loved one, you may have a case. Hardison & Cochran, Attorneys at law are personal injury lawyers located in Raleigh, North Carolina.  For more information regarding what to do if you have suffered as a result of a distracted driving accident, visit the website at www.lawyernc.com

Procedure for Handling Victims Claim Complaints

Victims who have undergone trauma because of any fatal incidents due to the negligence of others, they decide to seek advice of professionals for claiming for financial and health loss. Complaints are expressions of dissatisfaction by clients. Victims does complaints to professionals against their suffering relating to the service and experience the solicitors provide.

Based on the procedure the way complaints are handled, many clients encounter frustrated with the service they have acquired and are aggravated by the way their claim has been handled. The way client’s claims are managed can make all the difference in maintaining their association with clients. Handling victims complaints effectively, that actually raise the service offers to the solicitors which helps to nurture client commitment and positive testimonials. Indeed there is chance of loosing customers and negative advertising is created for not handling the complaints properly.

As a professional you need to evaluate each victim case independently to determine the need for any compensation. It is a solicitor to consider how serious the issue is, and most importantly, according to the client’s perspective. Indeed make sure that solicitor team associates are qualified to deal with clients sensitively and properly, and where necessary, can take activity to deal quickly with a problem.

It is an effective way for any solicitor to record complaint in central register and then open a separate file for complaints that include the details of the victim claim. It is also very essential for the complaints should be in written form if any aspects of their complaint are deemed to be outside of chambers’ complaints handling procedures.

After taking record of victims claim complaints solicitors must let him know the name of the person who will be dealing with the complaint within a day of receiving the complaint, then start to investigate against complaint.

Within three days of the victim’s complaint, the solicitor has to pass the complaint to the Client Care department, where an expert will examine the matter and the information in, if required he make discussions with the appointed solicitor and even with victim.

And within four weeks of receiving a complaint, a final response which will be sent to the client addressing the complaint in positioning the complaint whether to resolve or not.

The attorney assigned against the client complaint will not work on your case alone. They’ll be managing the case on a day-to-day basis and they’ll be who you cope with. Mostly attorneys work on a team base so that, during your lawyer’s absence your concerns can be responded to and your claim will be further progressed in the most efficient manner by other team members who will be able to tell you what is happening in your case, what activities are in-hand and organized and what happens next.

This is an issue published recently based on a scenario for misleading a citizen Richard Herman from Middle sex to make a claim who has not had an accident and he has never taken out PPI with phone calls and text messages by one of the companies informing him they could help him declare settlement after a car accident or claim back investment property on mis-sold ppi, or PPI as it’s known.

Considering this the victim registered with the Telephone Preference Service (TPS), for stopping unwanted sales calls. Later the AAC, company which had called Mr Herman on behalf of PPI Claim line, paid him £195 for his time and electricity, as well as his £25 court costs.

This means the firms that mislead with their sales promotions are also entitled for law breaking and claiming.

Gadlaw’s No Win No Fee ensures that no solicitor fee is incurred if you do not win your accident claim.

Car accidents can be very traumatic and can affect financially. To reduce financial stress car accident injury claim is necessary.Visit us to learn more about this service.

Texas Distracted Driving Statistics for 2012

car accidents

Despite numerous safety features in vehicles these days, traffic fatalities remain to be a problem across the USA. Each state has different laws regulating the use of cell phones while driving; including texting, talking, or the need for a hands free device.  Texas in particular is a state that sees a high rate of fatalities due to distracted driving, but according to the its state laws, texting while driving is not illegal under most circumstances. Below are some statistics on distracted driving in Texas, which should encourage all drivers to remain cautious and vigilant while behind the wheel. While the statistics are up to date, keep in mind that statistics for the whole of 2012 have not yet been released.

Driving Fatalities in Texas

This year so far, Texas has seen 2,545 car-related fatalities. In 2011, Texas had a total of 3,048 car-related fatalities. There can be as many as 10 crashes a day in Texas, and there has been at least one fatal car accident per day since 2000. Shockingly, the last day in Texas without a car-related fatality was November 7, 2000.

Last year, close to 30 percent of the 2,545 car-related fatalities were the result of drivers and passengers not wearing seatbelts. Close to 35 percent of the fatalities were due to alcohol, and 14 percent of the fatalities were because of distracted driving.

Fatalities Related to Distracted Driving

Distracted driving can affect a driver’s reaction time to make it as slow as a 70 year old’s reaction time. In Texas, teenagers are the drivers who are most inclined to talk on a phone or text while driving. In a recent survey, 56 percent of drivers aged 16 to 19 admitted to talking on a phone while driving, and 13 percent admitted to texting while driving. Actual numbers could be even higher than this.

Last year, more than 81,000 crashes were caused because of distracted drivers and 21 percent of fatal crashes with drivers aged 16 to 19 were the result of cellphone usage. Of these crashes, 361 were fatal. Driving while talking on the phone or texting makes a driver 23 times more likely to crash.

Using Phones While Driving in Texas

Right now, in Texas there is no state ban against texting while operating a vehicle. There is unlikely going to be a statewide ban on texting while in a car until midway through 2013. When the ban does come into play, there will likely be a $200 fine.

Right now, Texas law states that drivers under the age of 18 are not allowed to use any wireless devices while operating a vehicle. Of course, as shown by the statistics, teenagers are ignoring this restriction. Additionally, drivers with a Learner license are not allowed to use a handheld phone for the first 6 months that they have this license, school bus drivers are not allowed to use a phone while driving if children are in the car, and no drivers can use a phone while in a school crossing zone.

Distracted driving statistics are particularly shocking in the state of Texas, especially considering the number of young drivers who are ignoring restrictions and putting themselves, and other drivers, at risk. Keep these distracted driving statistics in mind the next time you pull out your phone while behind the wheel. Be cautious, follow road rules, and stay safe while on the road.

If you or a loved one were injured in an accident that was caused by distracted driving, it is important to seek legal representation to evaluate your case.  Roberts & Roberts Law Firm is a Texas law firm with a team of professionals focused on car accident cases.  For more information about driving distractions and car accidents, visit the website at www.robertslawfirm.com.